Legal Reasoning: How Well-Known Marks are Positioned Through Legal Positivism

نویسندگان

چکیده

Legal protection for well-known mark needs to be examined. Indonesia has tried conform its legal system with international law, most notably the Paris Convention and TRIPS Agreement. However, court’s decision indicates that remains unfavourable. This paper aimed analyse judges’ rationale when they rejected a lawsuit against trademark in which was dispute of “Starbucks” Pierre “Cardin”. study conducted using research methods it examined materials from decisions literature review. Therefore, knowing judge’s dismissing claim is essential. In first case, plaintiff’s documented evidence insufficient establish respondent’s bad faith, but justification rejecting either. Meanwhile, second judge denied based on ne bis idem, aims reach certainty, so can lean more toward positivism. The positivism requires clear rules as not cause multiple interpretations. geographical indication law does give complete regulations marks. As result, problems conflicts frequently arise practice comes

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Examples in Legal Reasoning: Legal Hypotheticals

This paper discusses examples, p a r t i c u l a r l y hypo the t i ca ls , t he i r use and generat ion, in legal reasoning. It examines the use of sequences of hypo the t i ca ls .

متن کامل

AI and Legal Reasoning

This paper presents a summary of the responses of a panel to issues on AI and legal reasoning. The panel consisted Among the issues addressed by the panel were: 1. What are the characteristics of the legal domain that make it interesting or amenable to AI approaches-what is special about it; 2. The open-textured nature of legal concepts and the implications this has for using Al-techniques, esp...

متن کامل

Argumentation in Legal Reasoning

A popular view of what Artificial Intelligence can do for lawyers is that it can do no more than deduce the consequences from a precisely stated set of facts and legal rules. This immediately makes many lawyers sceptical about the usefulness of such systems: this mechanical approach seems to leave out most of what is important in legal reasoning. A case does not appear as a set of facts, but ra...

متن کامل

Time in Automated Legal Reasoning

Despite the ubiquity of time and temporal references in legal texts, their formal-ization has often been either disregarded or addressed in an ad hoc manner. In this paper we address this issue from the standpoint of the research done on temporal representation and reasoning in AI. We identify the temporal requirements of legal domains and propose a temporal representation framework for legal r...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['1978-2292', '2579-7425']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2023.v17.55-68